Marvel still pursuing Sony deal, wants to reboot Spider-Man without Andrew Garfield

Earlier this week, hackers leaked private Sony documents which revealed that they had talks with Marvel about working together on Spider-Man movies. According to that report, the talks were dead, but Latino Review claims that a deal is still on the table.

Marvel wants to share the rights to Spider-Man in a 60/40 split (with Marvel getting the larger part). In that deal, Marvel would gain creative control and Sony would handle distribution. Latino Review continues with more details:

IF the Marvel/Sony deal were to go forward, Andrew Garfield would no longer be Peter Parker and any baggage from existing films, Raimi or Webb, would be non-canonical, Marvel doesn’t want any part of those films. The idea is that the Spider-Man romance movie has been played out over five installments, so any new Spider-Man films would focus on the difficulties of being a teenager and a superhero with a romance side-story, not the film’s focus. Marvel also thinks that the origin story is well-trodden territory, so any Spider-Man movies under this deal would begin with Peter Parker already leading a dual life. Spider-Man making his debut in Captain America: Civil War is still a distinct possibility and would serve as the character’s introduction to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. But as of now Spider-Man will NOT be in Civil War. I was told that they have a script nailed down.

Sony executives will be getting together in January to discuss the future of their Spider-Man franchise, and right now it seems like anything is possible… including that deal with Marvel. What do you make of this news? Would you miss Andrew Garfield? Let me know in the comments below.

SOURCE: Latino Review

favre1fan93

December 12, 2014

While I would miss Garfield as Spidey, if this does come to light, I do think it is the best move by Marvel to sever all ties to the previous films. And since Marvel makes amazing casting choices as it is, I’m sure they will find someone who really captures Peter Parker.
Garfield Fan

December 12, 2014

Casting Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone was probably the smartest thing Sony did with the franchise in 5 films. I understand Marvel’s desire to distance themselves from the Sony movies, but it’s a pity they cannot keep Garfield on as Parker/Spidey. I think he portrays the “Weight of the world on his shoulders” Parker well… And to me, that’s what makes Spider-Man, Spider-Man. His unyielding resolve despite conflicting interests.

Pity. Garfield is perfect for Spidey.
Mr. Mr.

December 12, 2014

i would miss Garfield too and he should be commended for doing a bang-up job in the Webb movies. it would be too bad if we never get to see the continuation of Garfield’s version of the character (which seems all the more likely now), but Andrew’s still young and has a bright future ahead of him.
But if Marvel takes over and decides to move on with another actor, let’s hope they find the right actor and that it be organic to the plot if they decide to add him into any Marvel universe movies/sequels.
OptimistPrime99

December 12, 2014

I think that the Batman v. Superman movie along with EVERYBODY being disappointed in The Amazing Spider-Man 2 film, has motivated Marvel to pursue Spider-Man. Garfield may just be DONE as Spider-Man. 25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_…
1. Riley
  
  December 12, 2014
  
  Many people were disappointed in ASM2 but it still has a fan base. It got over 50% positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. And it’s got 7 out of 10 stars on IMDb (the first one has 7.1/10). It’s popular to jump on the hate bandwagon when it comes to so-so comic book films and make them out to be worse than they were. Same thing happened to Man of Steel (which has similar Rotten Tomatoes & IMDb ratings), but DC/WB is forging ahead & building an entire cinematic universe around Henry Cavill’s Superman, which I think is a good move. Also, look what happened with James Bond. The reboot (Casino Royale) was solid, then the sequel (Quantum of Solice) was universally panned. Did MGM/Sony throw the baby out with the bath water? Nope! They moved ahead with Daniel Craig and made the masterpiece Skyfall. The problem with the Spider-Man franchise is Disney breathing down the necks of Sony execs. If they weren’t a factor I’m postive we’d get more Garfield Spidey movies. Incorporating the existing ASM universe into the MCU would be great. But since Kevin Feige is a known control freak he’ll want to fire Garfield and bring in his own people. Anyway, sorry for rambling on for so long!
  1. Mr. Mr.
    
    December 12, 2014
    
    good points made – totally agree with what you’re saying here!
  2. OptimistPrime99
    
    December 12, 2014
    
    There’s definitely similarities between ASM2 and MY Man of Steel movie, in terms of critical and fan reception. I just wish that Sony had the confidence and the vision to make the next movie THAT much better. Like Zack Snyder is doing with Batman v. Superman. Hiring the right director and script writer, is all Sony needs to do. But obviously, EVERY Spider-Man fan wants that character in the MCU. I’m glad that Marvel is trying to “save” cinematic Spider-Man. LOL
    1. Charles Tosti
      
      December 13, 2014
      
      Hey what’s up? I thought you were usually on the Batmannews site. I don’t usually come here (even though I’m a huge Spidey fan) just came here because I was curious with all these hacks going on and I wanted to see what’s going on. But yea it’s cool to see a familiar name. What do you think of all this?
      1. OptimistPrime99
        
        December 14, 2014
        
        I think that the supposed leaked emails from the Sony hacking, are absurd. Some of them are so ridiculous, that they’re hard to believe. Sony definitely looks bad. You’d think that they would’ve tightened their security a lot more. Especially after the PlayStation Network hack, a few years ago. But apparently, Sony is willing to at least share the Spider-Man film rights with Marvel.
      2. Charles Tosti
        
        December 14, 2014
        
        I think it’s not too hard to believe because look at how SONY’s been so quiet about this. Usually when something is a lie or a rumor, the company will instantly shoot it down but SONY hasn’t said a word. And who would blame them? It’s like having your pants pulled down in front of everybody. Now I don’t necessarily feel bad for the big suit executives because of their idiocy and greediness and corporate BS but I do feel bad for the people who work there. A lot of people could loose their jobs over this. Now all that being said, the best thing SONY could do is share the rights with Marvel. As you know in the leaks it sated that Marvel went with the proposal of a 60/40 spilt. Marvel puts up 60 percent of the cost to make the film and SONY puts up 40 while Marvel makes back 60 percent and SONY makes back 40. I think that’s a pretty good deal in my honest opinion. It would be a sign of good faith on SONY’s part because after these hacks they have lost a lot of fans.
      3. OptimistPrime99
        
        December 14, 2014
        
        I just hope that those idiots at Sony, don’t actually crossover the Men in Black franchise, with the 21 Jump Street franchise. LOL
      4. Charles Tosti
        
        December 14, 2014
        
        LOL That would be freaking hilarious though! I still remember watching MIB the animated series on Kids WB when I was a kid before I watched Batman Beyond. Oh the nostagia

Riley

December 12, 2014

Losing Garfield would be the only bad part of this. Maybe they can work something out that keeps him around. If the MCU Spidey is already active it would make sense for Garfield to keep playing him. Dude is a solid actor and has a real love for the character.

Joker

I could totally see this working out okay and especially with comic fan audiences but I feel people who are more fans of movies and not so much of comics in general might get a little put off by it. I mean it’d be the second Spiderman reboot in a (probably) short amount of time. The not retelling the origin again and focusing more on him as a teenager trying to be a superhero would be a good thing though. I’m definitely for that. I’d love to see Spiderman in that universe, but I just feel there would be a lot of confusion for non-comic fans who would be like “wait…is this part of the spiderman series or…?” haha.

favre1fan93

December 13, 2014

Yeah. That is definitely something to considers. I’m sure you, me and everyone else commenting here would be fine if Garfield stayed on; we’d all like it and know everything he’s done does not fit in to the MCU. But we have to remember that Spider-Man is one of Marvel’s most popular characters, due to animated series and other areas, that the general populace would most likely be very confused if previous films were still considered cannon.
Potterbat

December 14, 2014

You are right about the confusion and that is why this is a bad idea. But also as a Comic and movie fan, They are only doing this because anything tied into the Avengers makes a lot of money. TAS2 had mixed reviews, And Sony wants great. So that being said, its only because they see this as a resort to make money. They don’t want to put time and patience into a universe that is developing nicely. Its pure laziness. And I’m surprised some fans are even ok with this let alone embracing it.

dualdier12

To the people who are saying this is a bad deal without Garfield: WRONG! If they can replace Tobey, they can replace Garfield. This wouldn’t even be happening if they didn’t reboot the series in the first place and let Raimi do his thing. Avi Arad has ruined Spider-Man. This has been the best news I’ve heard since the last news I head when Tobey was signing a deal to do 4 and 5. They need to do this deal. I don’t care if it’s not Andrew or not. It hasn’t been good the first few movies. Gwen died, the chemistry’s gone. I’m so excited for this news and I hope it happens. All I really want is some banter between Iron Man and the web head himself. PLEASE DO THIS!!

Potterbat

December 14, 2014

Gwen Stacy dies in the comics, Im glad they killed her off, It just puts more depth and tension into the universe. This new TAS series has been the best so far. The ONLY reason they are contemplating integrating Spiderman into the Avengers universe is because its easy and it will make money. Its lazy and I’m really surprised some fans are embracing this news. We were just about to get a great spider universe, Just about to get into the great villains. Thanks Sony, Bastards.
1. dualdier12
  
  December 15, 2014
  
  I am well aware that Gwen dies in the comics, but they rushed to her death. Just because you follow the comics doesn’t make it good. I have to respectfully disagree with you when I say that TAS has NOT been the best. Spider-Man 2 was my very favorite and it still holds up to this day. Sony knows it would be great to have Spider-Man in the Avengers. Why? Because Spidey is the ICON of Marvel. (Sorry RDJ) I’m begging that this happens regardless of who’s cast at this point.
  1. Hortence Dumpty
    
    December 21, 2014
    
    they had to kill her off. fanboys knew she her death was just a matter of time.
  2. Potterbat
    
    December 31, 2014
    
    I completely agree that it doesn’t have to be scene for scene from the comics. My point is that killing off Gwen was a good thing in my opinion. I personally prefer when they take new approaches and just reference the comics. Regarding Spiderman being in the Avengers, I love it! I hope they do it, Just with Andrew Garfield. My argument is that Sony is doing this because Andrew talked smack about them, So they are considering someone else, That to me is wrong and un professional. He’s a contract worker, If he shows up on time and does his job with enthusiasm, then thats all that matters. Who cares if he disagrees with his bosses. He’s a good Spiderman and is part of a developed universe, Why ruin that? If your part of a gang and you talk shit about the gang, You get replaced. That is what’s happening here. Sony also sees it as, Since TASM2 had mixed reviews, Instead of sticking it out and giving us a Spiderman universe, They are pulling the plug and throwing him in the Avengers straight away. Why? Because its easy and makes money guaranteed. We shouldn’t be ok with this, Let alone be happy about it.
2. Hortence Dumpty
  
  December 21, 2014
  
  real fans knew from the first movie, ‘so when gwen dies, what redhead comes in for MJ?’
  
  gwen was ‘dead girl walking’ from day one.
stonelove

January 14, 2015

I’m sorry but the last movie with Tobey was lame as all hell. Emo lame ass crap. And I love spiderman and venom. He did horrible and killed the movies. Garfield fit way better

Guest

As long as they make a movie just like the comics I’m fine. The Amazing Spider-Man was the closest Spider-Man yet!

Brian Martin

Frankly, I hate it. There are still many loose ties and set-ups for future movies in the current series. I don’t want them to suddenly cancel it all!

SHUR-TUGAL

December 13, 2014

I think he had a good performance, but although the mystery of peter’s parents was great, the problem was the story, a good story but not great

Chuck

You know with the right script I think they should stick with Drake Bell. He’s had enough practice. Isn’t already hung up as being a “serious” actor. Thoughts?

Brian Martin

December 14, 2014

Ever saw “Superhero Movie”?

JMW5

As long as they make a movie just like the comics I’m fine.

Potterbat

December 14, 2014

This is honestly a really bad choice on Sonys part. Recasting Spiderman would be taking a developed character and throwing into the trash. We just got this new Spiderman reboot and it has been working well. Sure, A lot of people hated TAS2( I actually liked it ). but at the end of the day it sets its self up for Spiders universe. I honestly think this whole reboot spider AGAIN is laziness and greed. And they are supposed to be professionals, Who cares if Andrew G. thinks they(Sony) screwed the pooch with TAS2. They should just realize he’s a contract worker and if he shows up for film time, then who cares. Children.

Also, We were just about to be given Sinister 6 and Venom/Carnage etc. And now this…? Bastards!! And the only reason they are trying to integrate the Spider into the Avengers universe is because its easy and it makes money. Fans should be upset at this, Not embrace it.

Beast

Have we actually heard from Garfield aas far as his thoughts? If I were him, I’d lobby to have the MCU keep me around. There’s no reason he couldn’t, it’s not like anything happened in his films that would truly effect the outcome of the MCU’s plotted course. I’d have to say, he’s still my favorite for Spiderman.

December 16, 2014

Change is good. If this is what happens so be it. At least they made two movies instead one.

Puttish

While I don’t like the idea of a new Peter Parker every other year, he neeeeeeeds to be with Marvel so bad. So does Wolverine and X-Men and The Fantastic Four… Avengers 3 with Spidey and Wolverine would be awesome. DC/WB has the upper hand here since they own the rights to all DC characters…

Greg Gorham

December 19, 2014

Garfield is fantastic, but if they keep him audiences would connect the character to ASM and ASM2. That’s an absolute dead-end at this point. It’s too bad for Garfield, as he was by far the best part of those movies and was a great choice for the character. Unfortunately, casting him and Emma Stone were about the only good choices made in those films.

Hortence Dumpty

December 21, 2014

funny… that’s what they said about Chris Reeves, Micheal Keaton, and RDJ and anyone else playing characters in tv and movies…..

THEY’RE ALL REPLACEABLE!! its just a character!

some day, some other smug dickhead actor will have to play IRON MAN. and every other hero, villain, sidekick and love interest. they’re just movies!

robjoh

January 4, 2015

Who’s Chris Reeves again? If you mean Chris Reeve then yeah,I agree. But since they’re treating superheroes like James Bond or Doctor Who,well just do whatever it takes to get a good movie I guess.

And yeah,I know it’s easy to get George Reeves and Christoper Reeve mixed up,lol.

J-R!
stonelove

January 14, 2015

That’s not the point he’s getting at. In our time these are the faces we want to see. Most people don’t care to watch a series when the main characters change every 2 movies. For example. I enjoyed the blade movies. I refused to watch the last one bc they changed the actor. And I’m not the only person in the world to think and act that way. The movies are for the world. Not the people making them. So give the world what they want. In 10 years Idc who plays spiderman. But now after 2 damn good movies with that actor. I don’t want a new face. And neither does most people.

stonelove

January 14, 2015

Garfield is definitely the best choice as spiderman. His personality fits the role perfectly. Why do these things have to be so complicated. Give the fans what they want. We are the ones paying to see the movie.

As much as I would love to see spidey in marvel. I’d choose Garfield over that. Sorry but the dude actually likes the hero. And plays him well.

Robert Anderson

January 31, 2015

Andrew Garfield is Spider-Man hands down.When they cast Tobey for the first Spider-Man I was disgusted and still to this day refuse to watch any more then just the first one which I wish I could take back. Garfield on the other hand perfect plays the part to a t,I actually went to the theatre to see the first and second one, why does wolverine make so much money in his movies cuz he is the same actor every movie he is wolverine look no further Sony and marvel you have the right spidey now you just got to get the story right the sinister six idea fantastic should have done that first would have sold out box office’s but instead you tried bringing love,guardians of the galaxy was there love no and look top eight selling movie last year,it’s not Garfields fault it’s yours for picking such a mediocre story to settle with and of they cast drake bell as the new Spider-Man I am done worth Spider-Man for good its bad enough I had to stop reading the comics because they (marvel)restricted the artist from being themselves and let the best artists in the world go so why not hurt your movies as well good luck Stan Lee and marvel cuz one bad movie can ruin it all.

alex

February 7, 2015

drake bell should be the next spiderman
just look at him I mean he looks like he could be spiderman even plays as spiderman on Disney XD really guys he’s the one

I mean he’s geeky cool it would take some work but he could do it

what do you guys think?

Spider-Man News

Marvel still pursuing Sony deal, wants to reboot Spider-Man without Andrew Garfield

Comments

Browse By Topic

Browse By Year

About